Massachusetts Woman Charged With $3.6 Million in FOOD STAMP FRAUD

Who knew that scamming food stamps could be so lucrative? One Massachusetts woman managed to make well over three million dollars defrauding the program.

Connor D. Wolf of the Daily Caller:

How Just One Woman Defrauded Food Stamps For $3.6 million

Convenience store owner Vida Ofori Causey out of Worcester, Mass. was charged in federal court Monday after pleading guilty to $3.6 million worth of food stamp fraud.

According to authorities, Causey abused the program between 2010 and 2014. Food stamps, officially known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), is run by local and federal agencies. It is overseen by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). She was able to scam the program by buying food stamp benefits from receipts for half the actual value.

“Causey purchased the benefits at a discounted value of approximately fifty cents for every SNAP dollar,” a press release from Department of Justice stated. “By so doing, Causey caused the USDA to electronically deposit into a bank account controlled by her the full face value of the SNAP benefits fraudulently obtained.”

As a result, recipients had cash on hand to buy restricted items. The restricted items could include alcohol, cigarettes and even drugs. The program is supposed to be used to provide food to low-come individuals and families. In total, Causey defrauded the USDA for approximately $3,638,900.


Video=> U.N. Mocks U.S. By Making “We The People” Video In Support Of New Socialist Global Goals


The term “We the People”, taken from the preamble of the United States Constitution, is universally recognized as a symbol of liberty and freedom. That is unless you hate those American ideals, then you may use the phase to mockingly promote something counter to individual liberty, like… Socialism.

Last Friday, all member states of the United Nations, including the United States, officially adopted the new U.N. Sustainable Development goals. These new “global goals”, which were hailed by President Obama as “one of the smartest investments we can make for our own future”, were created under the guise of destroying world poverty and to fight Climate Change, but in reality these global goals include the Socialist/Marxist collective ideology of universal healthcare, universal employment, universal education, and wealth redistribution. If that isn’t bad enough, all of these global goals must be completed by 2030.

As apart of a propaganda campaign, the U.N. has released a video mockingly named, “We the People For The Global Goals”.  The star studded production features several Progressive elites such as: Aamir Khan, Ai WeiWei, A R Rahman, Ashton Kutcher, Bill and Melinda Gates, Cate Blanchett, Charlize Theron, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Chris Martin, Colin Firth, Daniel Craig, Djimon Hounsou, G.E.M., Gilberto Gil, Jennifer Lawrence, Jennifer Lopez, John Legend, Kate Winslet, Matt Damon, and Meryel Streep, just to name a few. All them teamed up with the U.N. in making this video in an effort to garner support for the new Socialist global goals.

In the beginning of the video several Progressive elites point out that these new global goals are for everyone, literally. No one will be left behind. I assume, if you like it or not:

“We can be. We must be. The first generation to end extreme poverty. The generation most determined to fight injustice and inequality. The generation that saves the planet from Climate Change. And this is how it will get done. The global goals. A 15 year plan for everyone, everywhere, with no one left behind.” 

After the mandatory collectivist statement has been made clear, the video continues with a glossing over, yet terrifying description of the 17 Socialist global Sustainable Development goals (you can read a more specific explanation of the goals here). The first two goals obviously refer to wealth redistribution (numbers added for reference):

(1) We will live in a world where nobody anywhere lives in extreme poverty.

(2) We will live in a world where no one goes hungry, no one wakes in the morning, asking if there will be food today.”

Goals 3 and 4 clearly cover universal healthcare and universal education:

(3) We will live in a world where no child has to die from disease we know how to cure and where proper healthcare is a lifelong right for us all.

(4) We will live in a world where everyone goes to school and education gives us the knowledge and skills for a fulfilling life.”

Goal 5 refers to equal rights for women and Goal 6 promises clean drinking water for everyone (can you say Obama’s water grab with the new EPA clean water rule?), while Goal 7 demands Sustainable energy for everyone (Smart Grid). But Goals 8 and 9 clearly refer to more wealth redistribution, universal employment, and possibly the abolition of private property:

(8) We will live in a world where economies prosper and new wealth leads to decent jobs for everyone.

(9) And we will live in a world where our industries, our infrastructure and our best innovations are not just used to make money- but used to make all our lives better.”

Goal 10 describes a world where prejudices and inequality no longer exist in countries and between countries (good luck with that), but Goal 11 stopped me in my tracks. Goal 11 actually stipulates that within the next 15 years all cities and communities will be safe, and (wait for it) Progressive. When a Socialist agenda, which in and of itself is Progressive by nature, specifically states a city or community must be Progressive, it sends a cold chill down my spine. What exactly that refers to is not clear, and most likely that vagueness is by design:

(11) We will live in a world where people live in cities and communities that are safe, Progressive, and support everyone who lives in them.

Goals 12 through 16 discuss more sustainability, fighting Climate Change, protecting the oceans, the forests, animals, the earth itself (?), and covers world peace and “open governments” (again ?). But Goal 17, in an effort for continuity, once again mentions that these goals are for everyone, everywhere and we must work together to make them happen. The video then ends with a speech and the encouraging words “Let’s get to work. Let’s make it happen”.

Ironically the specific phrase “We the People” is not clearly stated anywhere in the video except in the beginning title. Which, based upon the obvious anti-liberty essence of the U.N. global goals, suggests it was used in an attempt to give the goals a “freedom” feel and to dupe the historically disabled into feeling good about supporting the new Socialist global agenda. It’s a masterstroke of political warfare. Mockingly utilizing words which denote one set of ideals, in order to disguise an agenda based upon ideals which are on the polar opposite of the political spectrum, is a tactic that would have made National Socialist Joseph Goebbels proud.

But if the United Nations was honest they would change the title from, “We the People” to one which would more accurately describe their motives such as:

“From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.”

-Karl Marx

Video below:


SHOCKER: Trust in Media is at an ALL TIME LOW

This is what happens when the vast majority in media aligns itself with one party against half of the country. Only an idiot or a liar would suggest that the media is biased against liberals. The media has always leaned left, but in the age of Obama they have staged an outright war on right leaning Americans.

The Tea Party was called racist by media liberals from day one while violent crime-ridden Occupy camps were called mostly peaceful. Opposition to Obamacare and anything else Obama and Democrats wanted to do was called racist.

The Democrats created the completely fake “War on Women” and the media propagated the lie every step of the way.

Whenever a Republican says something the media deems controversial, every single Republican is forced to comment on their remarks. Democrats are never subjected to this treatment. If time permitted, a dozen other examples could be provided.

Chris Cillizza of the Washington Post seems to think this revelation about distrust in media applies to everyone:

Trust in the media is at an all-time low. That’s a terrible thing for all of us.

And now for today’s least shocking statistic: Just four in 10 Americans say they have a “great deal” or a “fair amount” of trust in the media to report the news fairly and accurately, according to new data from Gallup. That matches historic lows the media also “achieved” in 2012 and 2014.

And while Republicans trust the media less than Democrats do, the numbers across all party affiliations are in rapid decline from even a decade ago…

GOOD!, some of you will, undoubtedly shout — particularly if you are either a conservative Republican or liberal Democrat. You deserve what you get! Your years of lies and agenda-pushing have finally caught up to you. WE ARE ON TO YOU.

To which I say: Wrong.

I don’t say that to be a jerk. I understand that many people who feel passionately about the rightness of one party or the other (and plenty of people who don’t) are simply convinced that the media is pursuing some sort of narrative that somehow furthers our collective “goals.”

Twitchy has rounded up some reactions to this report:

BONUS TWEET: Charles C.W. Cooke of National Review has found the one leftist idiot who thinks the media is biased against liberals. This is hilarious and it comes from Hillary Clinton’s Facebook page:


Parents Outraged When Georgia Public School Teaches Kids ALL ABOUT ISLAM

Some parents in Georgia are mad as hell that their children are learning all about Islam in a public school. The same thing happened recently in Tennessee.

Liberals always claim they don’t want religion taught in public schools but there’s rarely any outrage from them about this.

Eric Owens of the Daily Caller reports:

Public School Parents In Georgia Furious About Middle School Islam Lessons

An outer suburb of Atlanta is the latest locale in America where some parents are expressing alarm because their middle school-aged children are learning about Islam but, the parents say, the school is pointedly ignoring Christianity.

Ryan Breece, a Christian father of three who has a sixth-grade daughter at Youth Middle School in Loganville, Ga., told local Fox affiliate WAGA-TV his daughter recently came home with a social studies assignment all about the core teachings of Islam.

According to Breece, the taxpayer-funded assignment meticulously instructs students about Islam but almost entirely ignores Christianity.

“We are seeing one page, five statements of Christian faith and we see five or 10 pages of Islamic faith,” the mad dad told WAGA-TV. “So we have no accountability to make sure that it’s equal.”



nancy pelosi

Even with mounting proof that Planned Parenthood, the largest provider for abortions in the country, is engulfed in the business of selling human baby body parts for profit. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi doesn’t believe it.

Here’s what she told Jake Tapper of CNN:

In true Pelosi fashion, she replied that “I don’t stipulate these videos are real,” and just as President Obama hears news first from the media, Pelosi told Tapper “I’ve seen some news reports on it, but I also know that some of it is not real and you can create any reality that you want.”

Can we call Nancy a science denier now?

Image: (Life News)

Bernie Sanders Promises That as President, He’ll Use Supreme Court to LIMIT FREE SPEECH

Whenever the Supreme Court makes a decision that progressives like, it’s the “law of the land.” Gay marriage, Obamacare, and abortion are sacred cows for the left.

Citizens United on the other hand, was a mistake that absolutely must be overturned and if Bernie Sanders is elected president, he’ll make sure it happens.

From CNN:

Bernie Sanders’ Supreme Court litmus test: Overturn Citizens United

Bernie Sanders said Monday that a commitment to getting big money out of politics would be his litmus test for Supreme Court nominees.

The Vermont senator and Democratic presidential contender told students at a University of Chicago Institute of Politics event that he wants to ban billionaires like conservative business moguls Charles and David Koch from influencing the outcome of elections.

“No nominee of mine to the United States Supreme Court will get that job unless he or she is loud and clear that one of their first orders of business will be to overturn citizens United,” Sanders said.

He was complaining about the 2010 ruling that lifted restrictions on outside groups’ spending on elections. Sanders has called for public financing of campaigns — which means candidates would get tax dollars to spend on their efforts but wouldn’t be allowed to raise and spend money otherwise.

Notice that Sanders never mentions George Soros, big unions or any of the rich Hollywood types who spend millions of dollars getting liberals elected.

What Sanders is really saying is that he intends to use the force of government to limit the free speech of the team he doesn’t like.

That’s what progressives want.

Bill Defends Clinton Foundation For Taking Foreign Cash While Hillary Was at State (VIDEO)

bill and hillary clinton

So the Clinton Foundation took in millions of dollars worth of foreign donations while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State. So what?

That’s exactly what former President Bill Clinton thinks of the entire debacle. Take a look at this video from the Daily Caller:

Image: (Zimbio)

Obama Scolds Iran at the UN: Chanting Death to America DOESN’T CREATE JOBS (VIDEO)

Does President Obama think people in Iran chant “death to America” because they don’t have jobs? That seems to be what he was implying when he scolded Iran at the United Nations today.

Perhaps he thinks that because of his Iran deal, he’s their president now too.

From the Washington Free Beacon:

Obama Scolds Iran: Chanting ‘Death to America’ Does Not Create Jobs

President Obama chided Iran for focusing on violent rhetoric rather than doing work to advance its economic interests during his speech Monday before the United Nations General Assembly, saying that “chanting ‘death to America’ does not create jobs or make Iran more secure.”

“That path is now available to a nation like Iran, which, as of this moment, continues to deploy violent proxies to advance its interests,” Obama said. “These efforts may appear to give Iran leverage in disputes with neighbors, but they fuel sectarian conflict that endangers the entire region and isolates Iran from the promise of trade and commerce. The Iranian people have a proud history and are filled with extraordinary petition, but chanting ‘death to America” does not create jobs or make Iran more secure.

“If Iran chooses a different path, that would be good for the security of the region, good for the Iranian people, and good for the world.”

Watch the video:


TALKING POINTS: Notice Anything Similar About These Tweets From Democrat Operatives?

Hillary’s email scandal is sinking her presidential campaign, so naturally the people who support her want everyone to stop talking about it.

She discussed the issue on Meet The Press today and after the appearance, these tweets started popping up.

Notice any similarities?

Time to move on, everyone.